I’m thinking, currently the requirements for delegators are still high. Like they will need to do the homework to investigate APY across node operators. And keep an eye on the platform for changes to APY or commission rate.
It would attract more delegators if we offer something more brainless. e.g delegation pool where delegators deposit to the pool instead of to individual node operators. the pool manager will manage the portfolio and take a small fee for that.
Anyone can create such pool, with a requirement of minimal staking from the creator, with similar restriction that the delegation it can attract is limited by the size of creator’s own stake.
It would be safe regards the funds. Pool owner can use the fund to delegate or undelegate and withdraw to the pool contract, but can never withdraw other people’s token to its own wallets.
The opinion of a person who is interested in the project and the growth of the token price.
Perhaps it will not be superfluous, only if there are no other tasks at the moment. But they are. I think that first the delegation task should be completed, and then the undelegation
time should be reduced to 1 week (= 1 era).
Many do not want to wait 2 weeks, so they are afraid for their tokens. It has been proven more than once that a long unstake time is only needed to block retail tokens. By reducing the undelegation time to 1 week (exactly 1 era), this will prove the transparency of the team’s intentions and attract more delegates.
This is exactly what interests me as a delegate first of all, and only then pools and other unimportant things.
I wanted to create a proposal, but I was too lazy. The only one who could be against it is the team. Therefore, I ask you on behalf of the delegators to work on reducing the under-delegation time to 1 week in advance.
Thanks for understanding
